Spillover exceeds the printed page. It contains original material that is connected to the topics discussed in issues of the Political and Legal Anthropology Review, showcasing the exchange of knowledge and ideas. In these on-line sections, we connect established scholars with the new generation of political and legal anthropologists. Younger scholars can enter into direct conversations with leaders in their fields. A question motivates each topic:

Anthropology has a rich theoretical tradition, one that engages with many branches of theory. What are some of the wider philosophical and anthropological concerns raised by changes to law? How can anthropological inquiry shed light on these shifts and the challenges they pose?

 Leo Coleman discusses recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings.

Anthropologists have acknowledged that academic and activist endeavors are not autonomous. The presumed borders between them are, as Sally Merry writes, porous. How have anthropologists navigated these fields, and what can it tell us about ‘fieldwork’ more generally?

 Budi Hernawan and Eben Kirksey reflect.

Fieldwork poses challenges, some anticipated and some unforeseen, for any ethnographer. How do these back stories inform the narratives we write (or do not write) and the pages of the Political and Legal Anthropology Review?

See Chelsey Kivland‘s response and Heath Cabot‘s photo commentary.

Anthropologists sent early warnings about the problems that could arise when NGOs become major players in social change. What have we learned about NGOs in more than two decades of research across the globe?

Read how James Ferguson and Akhil Gupta responded.

To initiate a new conversation, contact Associate Editor Kate Henne at kathryn.henne@anu.edu.au.